COLUMBUS, OHIO – In a novel approach to combat chronic absenteeism in schools, Ohio lawmakers have introduced a bipartisan bill that draws inspiration from Jean Shepherd’s adage, “In God we trust, all others pay cash.” Spearheaded by Republican State Representative Bill Seitz and Democratic Representative Dani Isaacsohn, both hailing from Cincinnati, the bill proposes a two-year pilot program aimed at incentivizing school attendance through cash transfers to students.
Don’t trust the media? Click here to get the real news from Dave Bondy. You will get his FREE email every morning at 7a.m. of the news the mainstream media doesn’t want you to see.
The initiative targets kindergarteners and ninth graders, two critical transition stages in a student’s educational journey, where attendance rates have notably declined, a situation further aggravated by the global pandemic. The Ohio Department of Education and Workforce reports a significant rise in chronic absenteeism, defined as missing 10% or more of the school year, from 11% to 29% among kindergarteners, and from 15% to over 31% among high school freshmen since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Isaacsohn, addressing the urgency of the matter before the House Primary & Secondary Education Committee, emphasized the critical state of educational attendance, calling it an “absolute emergency.” The proposed program includes a $1.5 million fund to support cash transfers in qualifying school districts, with flexibility in distribution methods ranging from biweekly to annual payments.
Additionally, the program offers a base award of $250 for graduating students from qualifying high schools, with potential increases based on academic performance. Eligibility for the program is tied to schools receiving federal Title 1 funding and ranking in the lowest 20% in graduation rates. The selection criteria ensure the inclusion of both rural and urban districts exhibiting the highest quartiles of chronic absenteeism.
Despite its innovative approach, the bill has faced criticism from some committee members who argue that financial incentives for attendance might encourage an entitlement mentality and undermine the intrinsic value of education. Critics, including State Representatives Beth Lear and Josh Williams, express concerns over the precedent such incentives might set, questioning the broader implications of paying individuals to adhere to legal and societal expectations.
Proponents, including Seitz and former teacher State Representative Sean Brennan, counter that traditional measures, including truancy enforcement, have proven ineffective in addressing absenteeism. They argue that the pilot program offers a pragmatic solution to a persistent problem, with potential long-term benefits for both students and the state in terms of reduced dropout rates, increased tax revenues, and lower interactions with the criminal justice system.
As the bill moves forward, it will undergo public hearings in the House Primary & Secondary Committee, offering a platform for both supporters and opponents to voice their opinions before a final vote is cast.
